繁体中文
设为首页
加入收藏
当前位置:其他文章首页 >> 文件格式 >> rtsp协议相关之-rfc2326

rtsp协议相关之-rfc2326

2005-06-26 14:17:38  作者:TaiJi1985  来源:互联网  浏览次数:106  文字大小:【】【】【
简介:Network Working Group                             &...
关键字:协议 2326 rtsp rfc

Network Working Group H. Schulzrinne

Request for Comments: 2326 Columbia U.

Category: Standards Track A. Rao

Netscape

R. Lanphier

RealNetworks

April 1998

Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The Real Time Streaming Protocol, or RTSP, is an application-level

protocol for control over the delivery of data with real-time

properties. RTSP provides an extensible framework to enable

controlled, on-demand delivery of real-time data, such as audio and

video. Sources of data can include both live data feeds and stored

clips. This protocol is intended to control multiple data delivery

sessions, provide a means for choosing delivery channels such as UDP,

multicast UDP and TCP, and provide a means for choosing delivery

mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 1889).

Table of Contents

* 1 Introduction ................................................. 5

+ 1.1 Purpose ............................................... 5

+ 1.2 Requirements .......................................... 6

+ 1.3 Terminology ........................................... 6

+ 1.4 Protocol Properties ................................... 9

+ 1.5 Extending RTSP ........................................ 11

+ 1.6 Overall Operation ..................................... 11

+ 1.7 RTSP States ........................................... 12

+ 1.8 Relationship with Other Protocols ..................... 13

* 2 Notational Conventions ....................................... 14

* 3 Protocol Parameters .......................................... 14

+ 3.1 RTSP Version .......................................... 14

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

+ 3.2 RTSP URL .............................................. 14

+ 3.3 Conference Identifiers ................................ 16

+ 3.4 Session Identifiers ................................... 16

+ 3.5 SMPTE Relative Timestamps ............................. 16

+ 3.6 Normal Play Time ...................................... 17

+ 3.7 Absolute Time ......................................... 18

+ 3.8 Option Tags ........................................... 18

o 3.8.1 Registering New Option Tags with IANA .......... 18

* 4 RTSP Message ................................................. 19

+ 4.1 Message Types ......................................... 19

+ 4.2 Message Headers ....................................... 19

+ 4.3 Message Body .......................................... 19

+ 4.4 Message Length ........................................ 20

* 5 General Header Fields ........................................ 20

* 6 Request ...................................................... 20

+ 6.1 Request Line .......................................... 21

+ 6.2 Request Header Fields ................................. 21

* 7 Response ..................................................... 22

+ 7.1 Status-Line ........................................... 22

o 7.1.1 Status Code and Reason Phrase .................. 22

o 7.1.2 Response Header Fields ......................... 26

* 8 Entity ....................................................... 27

+ 8.1 Entity Header Fields .................................. 27

+ 8.2 Entity Body ........................................... 28

* 9 Connections .................................................. 28

+ 9.1 Pipelining ............................................ 28

+ 9.2 Reliability and Acknowledgements ...................... 28

* 10 Method Definitions .......................................... 29

+ 10.1 OPTIONS .............................................. 30

+ 10.2 DESCRIBE ............................................. 31

+ 10.3 ANNOUNCE ............................................. 32

+ 10.4 SETUP ................................................ 33

+ 10.5 PLAY ................................................. 34

+ 10.6 PAUSE ................................................ 36

+ 10.7 TEARDOWN ............................................. 37

+ 10.8 GET_PARAMETER ........................................ 37

+ 10.9 SET_PARAMETER ........................................ 38

+ 10.10 REDIRECT ............................................ 39

+ 10.11 RECORD .............................................. 39

+ 10.12 Embedded (Interleaved) Binary Data .................. 40

* 11 Status Code Definitions ..................................... 41

+ 11.1 Success 2xx .......................................... 41

o 11.1.1 250 Low on Storage Space ...................... 41

+ 11.2 Redirection 3xx ...................................... 41

+ 11.3 Client Error 4xx ..................................... 42

o 11.3.1 405 Method Not Allowed ........................ 42

o 11.3.2 451 Parameter Not Understood .................. 42

o 11.3.3 452 Conference Not Found ...................... 42

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

o 11.3.4 453 Not Enough Bandwidth ...................... 42

o 11.3.5 454 Session Not Found ......................... 42

o 11.3.6 455 Method Not Valid in This State ............ 42

o 11.3.7 456 Header Field Not Valid for Resource ....... 42

o 11.3.8 457 Invalid Range ............................. 43

o 11.3.9 458 Parameter Is Read-Only .................... 43

o 11.3.10 459 Aggregate Operation Not Allowed .......... 43

o 11.3.11 460 Only Aggregate Operation Allowed ......... 43

o 11.3.12 461 Unsupported Transport .................... 43

o 11.3.13 462 Destination Unreachable .................. 43

o 11.3.14 551 Option not supported ..................... 43

* 12 Header Field Definitions .................................... 44

+ 12.1 Accept ............................................... 46

+ 12.2 Accept-Encoding ...................................... 46

+ 12.3 Accept-Language ...................................... 46

+ 12.4 Allow ................................................ 46

+ 12.5 Authorization ........................................ 46

+ 12.6 Bandwidth ............................................ 46

+ 12.7 Blocksize ............................................ 47

+ 12.8 Cache-Control ........................................ 47

+ 12.9 Conference ........................................... 49

+ 12.10 Connection .......................................... 49

+ 12.11 Content-Base ........................................ 49

+ 12.12 Content-Encoding .................................... 49

+ 12.13 Content-Language .................................... 50

+ 12.14 Content-Length ...................................... 50

+ 12.15 Content-Location .................................... 50

+ 12.16 Content-Type ........................................ 50

+ 12.17 CSeq ................................................ 50

+ 12.18 Date ................................................ 50

+ 12.19 Expires ............................................. 50

+ 12.20 From ................................................ 51

+ 12.21 Host ................................................ 51

+ 12.22 If-Match ............................................ 51

+ 12.23 If-Modified-Since ................................... 52

+ 12.24 Last-Modified........................................ 52

+ 12.25 Location ............................................ 52

+ 12.26 Proxy-Authenticate .................................. 52

+ 12.27 Proxy-Require ....................................... 52

+ 12.28 Public .............................................. 53

+ 12.29 Range ............................................... 53

+ 12.30 Referer ............................................. 54

+ 12.31 Retry-After ......................................... 54

+ 12.32 Require ............................................. 54

+ 12.33 RTP-Info ............................................ 55

+ 12.34 Scale ............................................... 56

+ 12.35 Speed ............................................... 57

+ 12.36 Server .............................................. 57

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

+ 12.37 Session ............................................. 57

+ 12.38 Timestamp ........................................... 58

+ 12.39 Transport ........................................... 58

+ 12.40 Unsupported ......................................... 62

+ 12.41 User-Agent .......................................... 62

+ 12.42 Vary ................................................ 62

+ 12.43 Via ................................................. 62

+ 12.44 WWW-Authenticate .................................... 62

* 13 Caching ..................................................... 62

* 14 Examples .................................................... 63

+ 14.1 Media on Demand (Unicast) ............................ 63

+ 14.2 Streaming of a Container file ........................ 65

+ 14.3 Single Stream Container Files ........................ 67

+ 14.4 Live Media Presentation Using Multicast .............. 69

+ 14.5 Playing media into an existing session ............... 70

+ 14.6 Recording ............................................ 71

* 15 Syntax ...................................................... 72

+ 15.1 Base Syntax .......................................... 72

* 16 Security Considerations ..................................... 73

* A RTSP Protocol State Machines ................................. 76

+ A.1 Client State Machine .................................. 76

+ A.2 Server State Machine .................................. 77

* B Interaction with RTP ......................................... 79

* C Use of SDP for RTSP Session Descriptions ..................... 80

+ C.1 Definitions ........................................... 80

o C.1.1 Control URL .................................... 80

o C.1.2 Media streams .................................. 81

o C.1.3 Payload type(s) ................................ 81

o C.1.4 Format-specific parameters ..................... 81

o C.1.5 Range of presentation .......................... 82

o C.1.6 Time of availability ........................... 82

o C.1.7 Connection Information ......................... 82

o C.1.8 Entity Tag ..................................... 82

+ C.2 Aggregate Control Not Available ....................... 83

+ C.3 Aggregate Control Available ........................... 83

* D Minimal RTSP implementation .................................. 85

+ D.1 Client ................................................ 85

o D.1.1 Basic Playback ................................. 86

o D.1.2 Authentication-enabled ......................... 86

+ D.2 Server ................................................ 86

o D.2.1 Basic Playback ................................. 87

o D.2.2 Authentication-enabled ......................... 87

* E Authors' Addresses ........................................... 88

* F Acknowledgements ............................................. 89

* References ..................................................... 90

* Full Copyright Statement ....................................... 92

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose

The Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) establishes and controls

either a single or several time-synchronized streams of continuous

media such as audio and video. It does not typically deliver the

continuous streams itself, although interleaving of the continuous

media stream with the control stream is possible (see Section 10.12).

In other words, RTSP acts as a "network remote control" for

multimedia servers.

The set of streams to be controlled is defined by a presentation

description. This memorandum does not define a format for a

presentation description.

There is no notion of an RTSP connection; instead, a server maintains

a session labeled by an identifier. An RTSP session is in no way tied

to a transport-level connection such as a TCP connection. During an

RTSP session, an RTSP client may open and close many reliable

transport connections to the server to issue RTSP requests.

Alternatively, it may use a connectionless transport protocol such as

UDP.

The streams controlled by RTSP may use RTP [1], but the operation of

RTSP does not depend on the transport mechanism used to carry

continuous media. The protocol is intentionally similar in syntax

and operation to HTTP/1.1 [2] so that extension mechanisms to HTTP

can in most cases also be added to RTSP. However, RTSP differs in a

number of important aspects from HTTP:

* RTSP introduces a number of new methods and has a different

protocol identifier.

* An RTSP server needs to maintain state by default in almost all

cases, as opposed to the stateless nature of HTTP.

* Both an RTSP server and client can issue requests.

* Data is carried out-of-band by a different protocol. (There is an

exception to this.)

* RTSP is defined to use ISO 10646 (UTF-8) rather than ISO 8859-1,

consistent with current HTML internationalization efforts [3].

* The Request-URI always contains the absolute URI. Because of

backward compatibility with a historical blunder, HTTP/1.1 [2]

carries only the absolute path in the request and puts the host

name in a separate header field.

This makes "virtual hosting" easier, where a single host with one

IP address hosts several document trees.

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

The protocol supports the following operations:

Retrieval of media from media server:

The client can request a presentation description via HTTP or

some other method. If the presentation is being multicast, the

presentation description contains the multicast addresses and

ports to be used for the continuous media. If the presentation

is to be sent only to the client via unicast, the client

provides the destination for security reasons.

Invitation of a media server to a conference:

A media server can be "invited" to join an existing

conference, either to play back media into the presentation or

to record all or a subset of the media in a presentation. This

mode is useful for distributed teaching applications. Several

parties in the conference may take turns "pushing the remote

control buttons."

Addition of media to an existing presentation:

Particularly for live presentations, it is useful if the

server can tell the client about additional media becoming

available.

RTSP requests may be handled by proxies, tunnels and caches as in

HTTP/1.1 [2].

1.2 Requirements

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",

"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this

document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [4].

1.3 Terminology

Some of the terminology has been adopted from HTTP/1.1 [2]. Terms not

listed here are defined as in HTTP/1.1.

Aggregate control:

The control of the multiple streams using a single timeline by

the server. For audio/video feeds, this means that the client

may issue a single play or pause message to control both the

audio and video feeds.

Conference:

a multiparty, multimedia presentation, where "multi" implies

greater than or equal to one.

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

Client:

The client requests continuous media data from the media

server.

Connection:

A transport layer virtual circuit established between two

programs for the purpose of communication.

Container file:

A file which may contain multiple media streams which often

comprise a presentation when played together. RTSP servers may

offer aggregate control on these files, though the concept of

a container file is not embedded in the protocol.

Continuous media:

Data where there is a timing relationship between source and

sink; that is, the sink must reproduce the timing relationship

that existed at the source. The most common examples of

continuous media are audio and motion video. Continuous media

can be real-time (interactive), where there is a "tight"

timing relationship between source and sink, or streaming

(playback), where the relationship is less strict.

Entity:

The information transferred as the payload of a request or

response. An entity consists of metainformation in the form of

entity-header fields and content in the form of an entity-

body, as described in Section 8.

Media initialization:

Datatype/codec specific initialization. This includes such

things as clockrates, color tables, etc. Any transport-

independent information which is required by a client for

playback of a media stream occurs in the media initialization

phase of stream setup.

Media parameter:

Parameter specific to a media type that may be changed before

or during stream playback.

Media server:

The server providing playback or recording services for one or

more media streams. Different media streams within a

presentation may originate from different media servers. A

media server may reside on the same or a different host as the

web server the presentation is invoked from.

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

Media server indirection:

Redirection of a media client to a different media server.

(Media) stream:

A single media instance, e.g., an audio stream or a video

stream as well as a single whiteboard or shared application

group. When using RTP, a stream consists of all RTP and RTCP

packets created by a source within an RTP session. This is

equivalent to the definition of a DSM-CC stream([5]).

Message:

The basic unit of RTSP communication, consisting of a

structured sequence of octets matching the syntax defined in

Section 15 and transmitted via a connection or a

connectionless protocol.

Participant:

Member of a conference. A participant may be a machine, e.g.,

a media record or playback server.

Presentation:

A set of one or more streams presented to the client as a

complete media feed, using a presentation description as

defined below. In most cases in the RTSP context, this implies

aggregate control of those streams, but does not have to.

Presentation description:

A presentation description contains information about one or

more media streams within a presentation, such as the set of

encodings, network addresses and information about the

content. Other IETF protocols such as SDP (RFC 2327 [6]) use

the term "session" for a live presentation. The presentation

description may take several different formats, including but

not limited to the session description format SDP.

Response:

An RTSP response. If an HTTP response is meant, that is

indicated explicitly.

Request:

An RTSP request. If an HTTP request is meant, that is

indicated explicitly.

RTSP session:

A complete RTSP "transaction", e.g., the viewing of a movie.

A session typically consists of a client setting up a

transport mechanism for the continuous media stream (SETUP),

starting the stream with PLAY or RECORD, and closing the

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 8]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

stream with TEARDOWN.

Transport initialization:

The negotiation of transport information (e.g., port numbers,

transport protocols) between the client and the server.

1.4 Protocol Properties

RTSP has the following properties:

Extendable:

New methods and parameters can be easily added to RTSP.

Easy to parse:

RTSP can be parsed by standard HTTP or MIME parsers.

Secure:

RTSP re-uses web security mechanisms. All HTTP authentication

mechanisms such as basic (RFC 2068 [2, Section 11.1]) and

digest authentication (RFC 2069 [8]) are directly applicable.

One may also reuse transport or network layer security

mechanisms.

Transport-independent:

RTSP may use either an unreliable datagram protocol (UDP) (RFC

768 [9]), a reliable datagram protocol (RDP, RFC 1151, not

widely used [10]) or a reliable stream protocol such as TCP

(RFC 793 [11]) as it implements application-level reliability.

Multi-server capable:

Each media stream within a presentation can reside on a

different server. The client automatically establishes several

concurrent control sessions with the different media servers.

Media synchronization is performed at the transport level.

Control of recording devices:

The protocol can control both recording and playback devices,

as well as devices that can alternate between the two modes

("VCR").

Separation of stream control and conference initiation:

Stream control is divorced from inviting a media server to a

conference. The only requirement is that the conference

initiation protocol either provides or can be used to create a

unique conference identifier. In particular, SIP [12] or H.323

[13] may be used to invite a server to a conference.

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

Suitable for professional applications:

RTSP supports frame-level accuracy through SMPTE time stamps

to allow remote digital editing.

Presentation description neutral:

The protocol does not impose a particular presentation

description or metafile format and can convey the type of

format to be used. However, the presentation description must

contain at least one RTSP URI.

Proxy and firewall friendly:

The protocol should be readily handled by both application and

transport-layer (SOCKS [14]) firewalls. A firewall may need to

understand the SETUP method to open a "hole" for the UDP media

stream.

HTTP-friendly:

Where sensible, RTSP reuses HTTP concepts, so that the

existing infrastructure can be reused. This infrastructure

includes PICS (Platform for Internet Content Selection

[15,16]) for associating labels with content. However, RTSP

does not just add methods to HTTP since the controlling

continuous media requires server state in most cases.

Appropriate server control:

If a client can start a stream, it must be able to stop a

stream. Servers should not start streaming to clients in such

a way that clients cannot stop the stream.

Transport negotiation:

The client can negotiate the transport method prior to

actually needing to process a continuous media stream.

Capability negotiation:

If basic features are disabled, there must be some clean

mechanism for the client to determine which methods are not

going to be implemented. This allows clients to present the

appropriate user interface. For example, if seeking is not

allowed, the user interface must be able to disallow moving a

sliding position indicator.

An earlier requirement in RTSP was multi-client capability.

However, it was determined that a better approach was to make sure

that the protocol is easily extensible to the multi-client

scenario. Stream identifiers can be used by several control

streams, so that "passing the remote" would be possible. The

protocol would not address how several clients negotiate access;

this is left to either a "social protocol" or some other floor

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 10]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

control mechanism.

1.5 Extending RTSP

Since not all media servers have the same functionality, media

servers by necessity will support different sets of requests. For

example:

* A server may only be capable of playback thus has no need to

support the RECORD request.

* A server may not be capable of seeking (absolute positioning) if

it is to support live events only.

* Some servers may not support setting stream parameters and thus

not support GET_PARAMETER and SET_PARAMETER.

A server SHOULD implement all header fields described in Section 12.

It is up to the creators of presentation descriptions not to ask the

impossible of a server. This situation is similar in HTTP/1.1 [2],

where the methods described in [H19.6] are not likely to be supported

across all servers.

RTSP can be extended in three ways, listed here in order of the

magnitude of changes supported:

* Existing methods can be extended with new parameters, as long as

these parameters can be safely ignored by the recipient. (This is

equivalent to adding new parameters to an HTML tag.) If the

client needs negative acknowledgement when a method extension is

not supported, a tag corresponding to the extension may be added

in the Require: field (see Section 12.32).

* New methods can be added. If the recipient of the message does

not understand the request, it responds with error code 501 (Not

implemented) and the sender should not attempt to use this method

again. A client may also use the OPTIONS method to inquire about

methods supported by the server. The server SHOULD list the

methods it supports using the Public response header.

* A new version of the protocol can be defined, allowing almost all

aspects (except the position of the protocol version number) to

change.

1.6 Overall Operation

Each presentation and media stream may be identified by an RTSP URL.

The overall presentation and the properties of the media the

presentation is made up of are defined by a presentation description

file, the format of which is outside the scope of this specification.

The presentation description file may be obtained by the client using

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 11]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

HTTP or other means such as email and may not necessarily be stored

on the media server.

For the purposes of this specification, a presentation description is

assumed to describe one or more presentations, each of which

maintains a common time axis. For simplicity of exposition and

without loss of generality, it is assumed that the presentation

description contains exactly one such presentation. A presentation

may contain several media streams.

The presentation description file contains a description of the media

streams making up the presentation, including their encodings,

language, and other parameters that enable the client to choose the

most appropriate combination of media. In this presentation

description, each media stream that is individually controllable by

RTSP is identified by an RTSP URL, which points to the media server

handling that particular media stream and names the stream stored on

that server. Several media streams can be located on different

servers; for example, audio and video streams can be split across

servers for load sharing. The description also enumerates which

transport methods the server is capable of.

Besides the media parameters, the network destination address and

port need to be determined. Several modes of operation can be

distinguished:

Unicast:

The media is transmitted to the source of the RTSP request,

with the port number chosen by the client. Alternatively, the

media is transmitted on the same reliable stream as RTSP.

Multicast, server chooses address:

The media server picks the multicast address and port. This is

the typical case for a live or near-media-on-demand

transmission.

Multicast, client chooses address:

If the server is to participate in an existing multicast

conference, the multicast address, port and encryption key are

given by the conference description, established by means

outside the scope of this specification.

1.7 RTSP States

RTSP controls a stream which may be sent via a separate protocol,

independent of the control channel. For example, RTSP control may

occur on a TCP connection while the data flows via UDP. Thus, data

delivery continues even if no RTSP requests are received by the media

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 12]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

server. Also, during its lifetime, a single media stream may be

controlled by RTSP requests issued sequentially on different TCP

connections. Therefore, the server needs to maintain "session state"

to be able to correlate RTSP requests with a stream. The state

transitions are described in Section A.

Many methods in RTSP do not contribute to state. However, the

following play a central role in defining the allocation and usage of

stream resources on the server: SETUP, PLAY, RECORD, PAUSE, and

TEARDOWN.

SETUP:

Causes the server to allocate resources for a stream and start

an RTSP session.

PLAY and RECORD:

Starts data transmission on a stream allocated via SETUP.

PAUSE:

Temporarily halts a stream without freeing server resources.

TEARDOWN:

Frees resources associated with the stream. The RTSP session

ceases to exist on the server.

RTSP methods that contribute to state use the Session header

field (Section 12.37) to identify the RTSP session whose state

is being manipulated. The server generates session identifiers

in response to SETUP requests (Section 10.4).

1.8 Relationship with Other Protocols

RTSP has some overlap in functionality with HTTP. It also may

interact with HTTP in that the initial contact with streaming content

is often to be made through a web page. The current protocol

specification aims to allow different hand-off points between a web

server and the media server implementing RTSP. For example, the

presentation description can be retrieved using HTTP or RTSP, which

reduces roundtrips in web-browser-based scenarios, yet also allows

for standalone RTSP servers and clients which do not rely on HTTP at

all.

However, RTSP differs fundamentally from HTTP in that data delivery

takes place out-of-band in a different protocol. HTTP is an

asymmetric protocol where the client issues requests and the server

responds. In RTSP, both the media client and media server can issue

requests. RTSP requests are also not stateless; they may set

parameters and continue to control a media stream long after the

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 13]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

request has been acknowledged.

Re-using HTTP functionality has advantages in at least two areas,

namely security and proxies. The requirements are very similar, so

having the ability to adopt HTTP work on caches, proxies and

authentication is valuable.

While most real-time media will use RTP as a transport protocol, RTSP

is not tied to RTP.

RTSP assumes the existence of a presentation description format that

can express both static and temporal properties of a presentation

containing several media streams.

2 Notational Conventions

Since many of the definitions and syntax are identical to HTTP/1.1,

this specification only points to the section where they are defined

rather than copying it. For brevity, [HX.Y] is to be taken to refer

to Section X.Y of the current HTTP/1.1 specification (RFC 2068 [2]).

All the mechanisms specified in this document are described in both

prose and an augmented Backus-Naur form (BNF) similar to that used in

[H2.1]. It is described in detail in RFC 2234 [17], with the

difference that this RTSP specification maintains the "1#" notation

for comma-separated lists.

In this memo, we use indented and smaller-type paragraphs to provide

background and motivation. This is intended to give readers who were

not involved with the formulation of the specification an

understanding of why things are the way that they are in RTSP.

3 Protocol Parameters

3.1 RTSP Version

[H3.1] applies, with HTTP replaced by RTSP.

3.2 RTSP URL

The "rtsp" and "rtspu" schemes are used to refer to network resources

via the RTSP protocol. This section defines the scheme-specific

syntax and semantics for RTSP URLs.

rtsp_URL = ( "rtsp:" | "rtspu:" )

"//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path ]

host =

(in dotted decimal form), as defined by Section 2.1

Schulzrinne, et. al. Standards Track [Page 14]

RFC 2326 Real Time Streaming Protocol April 1998

of RFC 1123 \cite{rfc1123}>

port = *DIGIT

abs_path is defined in [H3.2.1].

Note that fragment and query identifiers do not have a well-defined

meaning at this time, with the interpretation left to the RTSP

server.

The scheme rtsp requires that commands are issued via a reliable

protocol (within the Internet, TCP), while the scheme rtspu identifies

an unreliable protocol (within the Internet, UDP).

If the port is empty or not given, port 554 is assumed. The semantics

are that the identified resource can be controlled by RTSP at the

server listening for TCP (scheme "rtsp") connections or UDP (scheme

"rtspu") packets on that port of host, and the Request-URI for the

resource is rtsp_URL.

相关文章